Re: Why are we still using trn?
Mike Castle wrote:
> In article <Pine.LNX.4.51.0301231135090.29704@telemark.slac.stanford.edu>,
> Booker Bense <bbense@SLAC.Stanford.EDU> wrote:
> >_ Well, if I was interested in hacking on curses based news
> > readers, I'd be looking at languages like ruby, python or
> > perl. Computers are fast enough now, that an interpreted
>
> Larry used to threaten to rewrite trn in perl. There are certainly enough
Not trn, rn. Perl started out as a tool in which to write the Next
Generation rn. Then it, uh, went cancerous...
>Bela<
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
[Trn Home]
[Site Home]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[Hot Springs]
[Epson Inkjet]
[Mhonarc]
[Nntpcache]