On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 09:56:39AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 12:41 +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
>
> <SNIP>
>
> > >
> > > After the recommended change, the in-kernel config using a single gadget
> > > driver (the target) are able to build. Thanks for the detailed
> > > explanation btw.. ;)
> > >
> > > I've made the same change for tcm_usb_gadget in lio-core, and updated
> > > for-next-merge with the following merge patch:
> > >
> > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/nab/target-pending.git;a=commit;h=0c41520201bc0933d65b8644173802778f426234
> > >
> > > Please let me know if you have any other changes that should go into
> > > sunday's linux-next build.
> >
> > It looks ok to me. You can add my Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
> >
>
> Thanks Felipe!
>
> So with your Ack in place and if there are no more objections, the plan
> is now to take tcm_usb_gadget through target-pending/for-next-merge
> (along with sbp-target) for an initial upstream merge.
>
> Also, I'm fine if USB folks would prefer to take this via their tree
> now that the gadget target is residing within drivers/usb/gadget/, but
> AFAICT this looks harmless enough to merge directly via the target tree.
That's fine with me as well.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux SCSI]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Share Photos]
[IDE]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photos]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[Linux IIO]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Device Mapper]
[Linux Resources]