[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: I need something like ssh -D, but http proxy, not socks



On 4/11/10 6:31 AM, Ilya Basin wrote:
The SSH protocol itself supports names
resolving on server (PuTTY is the proof), but ssh -D provides only
socks4, which doesn't support names resolving on server.

That's not the case for OpenSSH; it's supported socks5 since 2003 (v3.7 and up) and socks4a since January last year (v5.2 and up). Both of those support resolving names on the server side if the socks client asks for it (eg in Firefox, about:config -> network.proxy.socks_remote_dns=true).

[1] http://anoncvs.mindrot.org/index.cgi/openssh/channels.c?annotate=1.169
[2] http://anoncvs.mindrot.org/index.cgi/openssh/channels.c?annotate=1.280

--
Darren Tucker (dtucker at zip.com.au)
GPG key 8FF4FA69 / D9A3 86E9 7EEE AF4B B2D4  37C9 C982 80C7 8FF4 FA69
    Good judgement comes with experience. Unfortunately, the experience
usually comes from bad judgement.


[Home]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

Add to Google Powered by Linux