Re: [Sipping] Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I don't intend to be strongly particular about the last "MUST NOT".
> 
> But RFC3261 say,
>       o  Once the UAS has sent or received an answer to the initial
>          offer, it MUST NOT generate subsequent offers in any responses
>          to the initial INVITE.  This means that a UAS based on this
>          specification alone can never generate subsequent offers until
>          completion of the initial transaction.
> 
> What do the above statements forbid?

Very little since from UAC perspective, the SDP MUST be ignored.  Thus if UAS places a modified SDP within a subsequent response, it isn't an offer SDP or an updated answer SDP.

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip
Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Announce]     [IETF Discussion]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux