Re: [Sipping] Is SDP in an unreliable response "the answer" ???

[Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I'm afraid we're over-engineering this whole thing, and we'll end up with something which is even more complicated than what we are trying to clarify :)

Regards,

Christer 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sipping-bounces@xxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:sipping-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hans Erik van Elburg
> Sent: 19. huhtikuuta 2010 14:56
> To: OKUMURA Shinji
> Cc: sipping@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Sipping] Is SDP in an unreliable response "the 
> answer" ???
> 
> > - An UAS MAY insert a SDP body that is identical to the SDP
> >  answer, in an unreliable provisional response before the SDP
> >  answer has been sent.
> >
> > - The UAS MUST NOT insert a SDP body that is not identical to
> >  the SDP answer, in an unreliable provisional response before
> >  the SDP answer has been sent.
> >
> This is terribly confusing. Very probabe that noone will get it right.
> Triple negation. And talking about sending and answer before  
> the answer has been sent. ???
> 
> 
> > - The UAS MUST NOT insert a SDP body in any response after the
> >  SDP answer has been sent.
> >
> This means that you can't send it again after you've send it 
> in an unreliable provisional response. Do you want tto say that?
> 
> /Hans Erik van Elburg
> _______________________________________________
> Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
> This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP 
> Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current 
> sip Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP
> 
_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip
Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP