[Sipping] Question on draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition-07
- Subject: [Sipping] Question on draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition-07
- From: "Elwell, John" <john.elwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:25:00 +0100
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Delivered-to: sipping@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcqgT5WvTMYJaCCYTDWbuorR4C4ZtA==
- Thread-topic: Question on draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition-07
" 1. In some cases, especially those dealing with third party call
control (see Section 4.2 of [12]), there arises a need to specify
the IPv6 equivalent of the IPv4 unspecified address (0.0.0.0) in
the SDP offer. For this, IPv6 implementations MUST use a domain
name within the .invalid DNS top-level domain instead of using
the IPv6 unspecified address (i.e., ::)."
Can somebody recall the reason for this? Both "0.0.0.0" and "::" mean "unspecified" in their respective IP versions.
John
_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip
Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP
[IETF Announce]
[IETF Discussion]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Free Online Dating]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]
[Big List of Linux Books]