Re: Design meeting for draft-ietf-sipping-[profiles]

[Daniel Petrie <dpetrie@xxxxxxxxx>]

If I recall, we already brought this issue up a few years ago.  Which is why I converted the profile drafts to use relax NG.

--- On Tue, 3/24/09, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Design meeting for draft-ietf-sipping-config-framework
> To: "Dale Worley" <dworley@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Gonzalo Camarillo" <Gonzalo.Camarillo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Mary Barnes" <mary.barnes@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Martin Dolly" <mdolly@xxxxxxx>, "Sumanth Channabasappa" <sumanth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Sam Ganesan" <sam.ganesan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Volker Hilt" <volkerh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Daniel Petrie" <dan.ietf@xxxxxxxxx>, "Jonathan Rosenberg (jdrosen)" <jdrosen@xxxxxxxxx>, "John-Luc Bakker" <jlbakker.ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Andrew Hutton" <andrew.hutton@xxxxxxxxxxx>, peter_blatherwick@xxxxxxxxx, alvin@xxxxxxxxxx, "Francois Audet" <audet@xxxxxxxxxx>, ekr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, roni.even@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Josh Littlefield (joshl)" <joshl@xxxxxxxxx>, "SIP Forum UA-Configuration Group" <ua-config@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "SIPPING" <sipping@xxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tuesday, March 24, 2009, 4:56 PM
> 
> On Mar 24, 2009, at 11:29 , Dale Worley wrote:
> 
> > --- Schema language to specify data ranges, i.e., XML
> Schema Language
> > vs. Relax NG.  But note that Relax NG seems to
> delegate atomic types to
> > XML Schema Language.
> 
> Either can work here but what we choose here will more or
> less set what we have to use for all the config data. It's
> seem to me that most the XML experts that work with both
> strongly prefer relax NG so I would go that way.
> 
> Cullen <with my individual contributor hat on>
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip
Use sip@xxxxxxxx for new developments of core SIP