Re: strange sniff/scan ???

[ctino.schmitt@xxxxxxxxxxx (SchmiTTT)]

thanks for all hints.
i think i learned something.
no matter if sarcastic or ironic,
we all do learn.

nice weekend to you.
regards
Tino.


Am Don, 2003-05-01 um 20.38 schrieb Paulo Abrantes:
> On 01 May 2003 10:25:26 -0500
> "Robert A. Thompson" <ucs_rat@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> > I'm sure with a little foot work you can have it down to a pedestal and
> > then down to a home.  I find clubs/bats/etc work a lot better than
> > abuse@ when you can nail it down.
> > 
> 
> I really hope you are just being sarcastic about that clubs/bats/etc thing :)
> But about the abuse@, you are right. I think the obvious explanation is that
> the ISP will definatly not cut an account of a cliente because the ISP earns
> money for giving services to clients. So mostly (at least with my experience)
> they will say that cannot determinate which client was (even when you give them 
> IP and hh:mm:ss time). They don't know you, they don't get money from you, so
> hell that don't give a damn on you. 
> At least, this is why I think abuse doesn't work most of the times! I might
> be wrong, who knows...
> Maybe the clubs weren't a bad idea afterall ;) 
> 
> Regards,
> Paulo
> 
> 
> 
> P. Abrantes
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  
> 	Computer Science Student @
> 	Instituto Superior Tecnico
> 	  (http://www.ist.utl.pt) 
>  
> This email fortune cookie: 
>  
> >From the moment I picked your book up until I 
> put it down I was convulsed with laughter. Some 
> day I intend reading it. -- Groucho Marx
>  
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>      To unsubscribe email security-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>          with "unsubscribe" in the subject of the message.
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
     To unsubscribe email security-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
         with "unsubscribe" in the subject of the message.