Re: Digicam (to dickbo)

[byard pidgeon <bluedove@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

It was a joke, my man...agreeing with you but in total irony.

Don't know why any relationship to Walter would matter (perhaps the
scientific expertise in Forbidden Planet?), but there is a distant or not so
distant relationship...my grandfather came from the same town, I believe,
and although I haven't seen any of Walt's flicks for a long time, there are
some strong resemblances (in photos) between Walter and my grandfather and
my father's generation...less so as we dive repeatedly into the gene pool,
though.

on 06/14/2002 07:39 AM, dickbo at dickbo@btopenworld.com wrote:

> Don't understand all that Mr Pidgeon. By the way, your not related to the
> actor Walter Pidgeon are you because if you are then this is a whole new
> ball game.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "byard pidgeon" <bluedove@ccountry.net>
> To: <scan@leben.com>
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 5:34 PM
> Subject: Re: Digicam
> 
> 
>> You just don't get it, do you? Liking what you or the client see is
>> irrelevant...the picture must conform to the established or at least,
>> currently accepted dogma (oh, I mean, facts) of optical science.
>> Whether one "likes" it means nothing, unless one has the proper
>> accreditation from higher authorities...than one may be permitted to say
> "I
>> like it", or "this one looks better than that one".
>> 
>> 
>> on 06/10/2002 09:11 AM, dickbo at dickbo@btopenworld.com wrote:
>> 
>>> Actually you can settle the whole issue by simply asking yourself this
>>> rather fundamental question "Do I like what I see?" or perhaps in your
> own
>>> particular case it might read "does the client like what he sees?"
>>> 
>>> To which I might add "...and will he pay for it"  (:-)

-
Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.