Re: Digicam

[Kennedy McEwen <rkm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In article <B92E17BE.2E84%bluedove@ccountry.net>, byard pidgeon 
<bluedove@ccountry.net> writes
>You just don't get it, do you? Liking what you or the client see is
>irrelevant...the picture must conform to the established or at least,
>currently accepted dogma (oh, I mean, facts) of optical science.
>Whether one "likes" it means nothing, unless one has the proper
>accreditation from higher authorities...than one may be permitted to say "I
>like it", or "this one looks better than that one".
>
Sounds like YOU don't get it, do you - should spend less time being 
obsessed with dogma and a little more time reading the facts!!

Nobody has suggested the image was not acceptable to the end user, 
indeed I have said at least TWO messages that I am confident that the 
image looked IMPRESSIVE.  The issue in question is whether the image is 
PERFECT at close inspection, as claimed.

Now, if you can't add anything to the facts, I suggest you take your 
rather childish jibes off the list and grow up!
-- 
Kennedy
Yes, Socrates himself is particularly missed;
A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's pissed.
Python Philosophers
-
Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.