|
|
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
Custom Search
|
I was describing how the print looks, as a comparison with something we all recognize. The "grainy" appearance was not film grain, but printer dithering..."grain" wasn't the point. on 06/12/2002 11:48 PM, Kennedy McEwen at rkm@kennedym.demon.co.uk wrote: > In article <B92D7EFA.2E71%bluedove@ccountry.net>, byard pidgeon > <bluedove@ccountry.net> writes > > "looks like a grainy photo from a normal viewing distance..." > - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
![]() |