Re: Digicam

["dickbo" <dickbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Do it for yourself old fruit. Just use your eyes...if you have any that is.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Arthur Entlich" <artistic-1@shaw.ca>
To: <scan@leben.com>
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 12:05 PM
Subject: Re: Digicam


>
>
> dickbo wrote:
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "SKID Photography" <skid@bway.net>
> > To: <scan@leben.com>
> > Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 3:58 AM
> > Subject: Re: Digicam
> >
> >
> >
> >>"Paul D. DeRocco" wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Even with Kodachrome 25, a tripod, and a fixed focal length lens, I
> >>>
> > don't
> >
> >>>believe there's ever 8000dpi worth of actual picture information on a
> >>>
> > piece
> >
> >>>of film.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Paul,
> >>Then you would be wrong.  There is well over 40,000 dpi in a piece of 35
> >>
> > mm
> >
> >>film.
> >>
> >
> > Most of which you cannot possibly see with the naked eye.
> >
> >
> Please provide proof of this from your extensive personal experience and
test results.
>
>
> Otherwise, please stop speculating.
>
> Art
>
>
>
>
> -
> Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
> subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
>


-
Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.