Re: walexander@leisurepublishing.com

[Arthur Entlich <artistic-1@xxxxxxx>]

I have read of complaints by users of the Nikon IV, as well.  However, 
the effect is less noticeable, simply because the Nikon IV is a 2900 dpi 
scanner.  The more resolution, the more obvious the DOF problem.  It 
became a more noticeable problem to the point where people were 
rejecting the units with the 4000ED and 8000ED both of which use 4000 dpi.

Art



Richard Martin wrote:

> --- Arthur Entlich <artistic-1@shaw.ca> wrote:
> 
>>....  The Nikon scanners all suffer from reduced DOF, to
>>the point 
>>that they literally cannot tolerate typical curvature of
>>mounted slides, 
>>nor the warp that occurs in using non-glass carriers....
>>
> 
> I know that this discussion was about an MF scanner but do you
> feel that this is a serious problem with 35mm scanners like the
> Nikon IV ED too? I haven't heard of this in my correspondence
> with users.
> 
>                                            Richard
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> =====
> Richard Martin specializes in Cityscape and Waterscape stock photography as well as Children's Portraiture. E-mail: marphoto@yahoo.com
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
> http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
> -
> Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
> subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
> 
> 


-
Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.