[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: walexander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




----- Original Message -----
From: "Arthur Entlich" <artistic-1@shaw.ca>
To: <scan@leben.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 5:26 AM
Subject: walexander@leisurepublishing.com

> PS: I own a good smack of Nikon lenses and camera bodies, which
are very
> fine, but I don't think much of their scanners from all the
reports I
> have read (I have no owned any).


Maybe you should have put this part at the top of your message.
With such a detailed negative report on the Nikon I would have
done that. Sure this was meant to be a private message, does that
make it any better? Are you on a crusade to rescue Polaroid's
scanner department ?

There must be an archive of the list that shows all the pros and
cons of the MF film scanners, it will be a more objective source
for the potential purchaser of a MF scanner.

Ernst



-
Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.

[Books]     [Home]     [Photos]     [Yosemite]     [Scanners]     [Steve's Art]     [The Gimp]     [100% Free Online Dating]     [PhotoForum]     [Epson Inkjet]

Powered by Linux