| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
Supposedly, 6 megapixels is the threshold point for making "real" photos with a digicam...but, making a "real" photo quality neg or slide with a film recorder requires just under 12 megapixels (and a good FR, like a PCR II at least). So, it seems to me that what we really need are 12 megapixel digicams, and we're only halfway there. I'm defining the quality factor as being sufficient to make a neg that produces a photo print of at least 11X and preferably 16X that's indistinguishable from a camera neg. Along the same lines, my film scanner yields about 14 megapixels...doesn't it make sense that 12-14 megapixels is what we need in a pro quality digicam? - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
[Books] [Home] [Photos] [Yosemite] [Scanners] [Steve's Art] [The Gimp] [100% Free Online Dating] [PhotoForum] [Epson Inkjet]