|
|
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
Custom Search
|
At 03:33 AM 5/15/2002 -0700, you wrote: >I wouldn't expect the scanner, or any other device, to run at the maximum >USB2 rate, merely that it run faster than USB1. There's more than the transfer rate that affects how fast the scanner "runs". I would expect any speed bottleneck to probably be shifted from the data transfer process to the actual scanning process. **************** James E. Martz Milan, OH jemartz@earthlink.net ***************** - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
![]() |