|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
Hi Phil, Will be anxiously awaiting your tests. First impressions with the polaroid 4000 plus aren't as good as I was expecting. The images scanned at 4000 DPI Optical are not as sharp as the Canon 2710 FS which it was going to replace. I also got more shadow detail from the canon, but learning the software correctly would probably fix that. However if I can't get past the sharpness problem, I'll be returning it. The problem may be with the scanner, as the differenceis quite noticeable. The results should have been reversed. Jerry Carl Grohs wrote: > From: "Phil.Lippincott" <firstname.lastname@example.org> > Subject: Re: Proposal for Scanner Comparison > > (snip) > > I personally am also planning now on a new web site where > over 40 scanner comparisons , with objective benchmarks will be online for > people to see first hand what they do versus the marketing claims. > > Phil Lippincott > > ************************* > > Wonderful idea, can't wait. A source for unbiased information with which to > make an informed decision-what a novel idea! Just curious, if you don't > mind, what will be the source of the scanners tested? I would find it hard > to believe that the manufacturers themselves would be willing to participate > in holding their equipment up to independent testing. > > Warmest Regards, > Carl Grohs, Jr. Design Directions Eden, NC > > Good scan info site: > www.scantips.com > List archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scan > > - > Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate > subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions. - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.