Re: Proposal for Scanner Comparison

["dickbo" <dickbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Well if you chose to announce that you are starting from scratch then no one
in their right mind would submit to the scheme

----- Original Message -----
From: <rafe.bustin@verizon.net>
To: <scan@leben.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: Proposal for Scanner Comparison


> [rafe b:]
> > > Others might be curious to know the differences
> > > (if any) between the various models of scanners.  And
> > > surely, those who have not yet made a purchase, but are
> > > looking for a point of comparison, might benefit from
> > > the results of the proposed exercise.
>
> [dickbo:]
> > I doubt that anyone on here is qualified to either structure or analyse
> > anything as substantial as a full blown, and therefore meaningful test
> > procedure.
>
>
> Yet another armchair quarterback saying "It can't be
> done."  Feh.  Why make it complicated?  And who said
> anything about "full blown?"
>
> My proposal was quite simple.  No special targets or test
> methods.  Read the history of science, dickbo.  Start with
> Galileo.
>
> If we find that there are no discernable differences with
> these methods, so be it.  That in itself becomes a useful
> fact, and a possible starting point for further tests.
>
>
>
> rafe b.
>
> -
> Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
> subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.

-
Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.