Re: Proposal for Scanner Comparison

[Arthur Entlich <artistic-1@xxxxxxx>]

dickbo says:

> 
> I doubt that anyone on here is qualified to either structure or analyse
> anything as substantial as a full blown, and therefore meaningful test
> procedure.
> 


> ...and jolly good luck to you squire. I hope your ready for the law suits.
> 

> He won't sell by being objective so one must expect business to decline
> then.
> 

And this is the guy who refers to me as being "negative"...

And from the last statement, it is also obvious this guy also thinks 
that you have to lie to your clients to sell product.  After all, no 
products apparently exist that are made well enough to actually sell on 
their objective merits...

Is this another of dickbo's postulates?  I'll be sure to write it down 
somewhere for future reference.

Art

dickbo wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <rafe.bustin@verizon.net>
> To: <scan@leben.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 2:42 PM
> Subject: Re: Proposal for Scanner Comparison
> 
> 
>>Others might be curious to know the differences
>>(if any) between the various models of scanners.  And
>>surely, those who have not yet made a purchase, but are
>>looking for a point of comparison, might benefit from
>>the results of the proposed exercise.
>>
> 
> I doubt that anyone on here is qualified to either structure or analyse
> anything as substantial as a full blown, and therefore meaningful test
> procedure.
> 


-
Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.