|
|
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
Custom Search
|
[rafe b:] > > Others might be curious to know the differences > > (if any) between the various models of scanners. And > > surely, those who have not yet made a purchase, but are > > looking for a point of comparison, might benefit from > > the results of the proposed exercise. [dickbo:] > I doubt that anyone on here is qualified to either structure or analyse > anything as substantial as a full blown, and therefore meaningful test > procedure. Yet another armchair quarterback saying "It can't be done." Feh. Why make it complicated? And who said anything about "full blown?" My proposal was quite simple. No special targets or test methods. Read the history of science, dickbo. Start with Galileo. If we find that there are no discernable differences with these methods, so be it. That in itself becomes a useful fact, and a possible starting point for further tests. rafe b. - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
![]() |