Re: Proposal for Scanner Comparison

["dickbo" <dickbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Iave you ever considered that the number of people not satisfied with their
scanners is vastly less that those who are.

I would suggest that noone in their right mind purchase a product in order
to find out what it's faults are and indeed if they cannot observe them
without going to the trouble of inventing  a test programme then it would be
fair to claim they have no faults.


----- Original Message -----
From: <rafe.bustin@verizon.net>
To: <scan@leben.com>
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:06 PM
Subject: Re: Proposal for Scanner Comparison


> On 29 Apr 2002 at 14:58, Simon Lamb wrote:
>
> > Ah, Rafe, what did you expect.  I doubt anyone who has committed to a
> > scanner and the ensuing cost will want to find out it is not the top of
the
> > tree, and we all want our justifications to remain in tact.
>
>
> Could be, who knows.  I chalked it up to sloth and apathy.
> Sometimes it seems folks would rather speculate and
> argue than deal with facts.
>
> Many moons ago I did in fact have a few pages on my
> web site with sample scans from a number of film scanners.
> But that was mostly before the new 120-film models
> from Polaroid, Nikon and Minolta arrived.
>
>
> rafe b.
>
> -
> Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
> subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.

-
Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.