|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave King" <email@example.com> To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 6:56 AM Subject: Re: nikon 8000 or polaroid 120 (now comparing with an Imacon Photo) > It's just that neither the Polaroid or the Nikon is particularly difficult > in use, nor do either have "real world" problems. How true > Certain folks have more > "problems" with technical gear than others, and others appear to enjoy > speculating ad infinitum about so called design flaws in gear they have no > direct experience of. How true All of the reported so called flaws with the LS-8000 > appear to me to be intelligent design features. Quite so > Michael Reichmann says in his review of the LS-8000 it's 97% of the image > quality of the Flextight Photo, but the Flextight is still significantly > more expensive, and no dICE. I haven't used the Flextight, but I can tell > you I'm very impressed with the LS-8000. The majority of professional users > will find very little to complain about here. You sir, are clearly a rational human being and as such deserve all our attention in anything you say, either now or in the future. By the way, you may be intrested in knowing that St Erlich is the patron saint of pedantry (:-) - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.