|
|
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
Custom Search
|
The Imacon Photo is $4,995 dollars plus rebates. In the UK it is £3,999 plus VAT. I doubt you will get a used drum scanner at that price. I will say that, looking like a tin box, it is more in keeping with a PC and would look nice next to a pentium IV. It would ruin the look of my Mac ;-) Simon ----- Original Message ----- From: "dickbo" <dickbo@btopenworld.com> To: <scan@leben.com> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 8:13 AM Subject: Re: nikon 8000 or polaroid 120 > I observe that at $10,000 the Imacon is something more than a hobby device. > > At that price I wouold suggest that a second hand drum scanner would be a > better buy. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <rafe.bustin@verizon.net> > To: <scan@leben.com> > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 1:13 PM > Subject: Re: nikon 8000 or polaroid 120 > > > > On 24 Apr 2002 at 22:08, Stephen Greenfield wrote: > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 4:25 AM > > > > To: scan@leben.com > > > > Subject: nikon 8000 or polaroid 120 > > > > > > > > > > > > I am in need of purchasing a scanner for 120 film. which is best ? > > > > thanks > > > > John > > > > > > John, > > > > > > I would seriously look at the Imacon Photo before either the Nikon or > > > Polaroid models. Yes, it's more money, though with extra film holders > and > > > film rebates now it would be around 1500.00 more or less than the top > > > Polaroid model. > > > > > > No doubt the Imacon is a top-notch film scanner, one of the best > > CCD scanners you can buy. I've seen prints made from Imacon > > scans, and they are dazzling. > > > > At the time the SS-120 and LS-8000 were introduced, it was still > > several times more expensive than either of these newcomers. > > > > The two new models, as good as they were, created a downward > > pressure on the Imacon's selling price, so that now the Imacon > > is "only" $1.5 to $2K or so more expensive than the new models. > > > > One reviewer (Michael Reichman) has posted some direct A:B > > comparisons between LS-8000 scans and those from an Imacon, > > (along with his comments on that comparison) at: > > > > <http://luminous-landscape.com/nikon-8000.htm> > > > > > > rafe b. > > > > - > > Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate > > subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions. > > - > Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate > subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions. > - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
![]() |