RE: Questions about Genuine Fractals

"Laurie Solomon" <laurie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> · Fri, 26 Apr 2002 00:14:21 -0500

Byard,

Be aware that the trial versions all allow for limited file sizes and
limited increases in size and resolutions of the images.  I do not know the
actual limitations; but I do know that there are limitations.  This is why I
did not suggest it; however, what you want to do may fit within the
restrictions.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-scan@leben.com [mailto:owner-scan@leben.com]On Behalf Of
byard pidgeon
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 5:08 PM
To: scan@leben.com
Subject: Re: Questions about Genuine Fractals

Thanks Paul...didn't realize there was a trial version. Haven't been to the
site yet.

on 04/25/2002 01:28 AM, Paul D. DeRocco at pderocco@ix.netcom.com wrote:

> I've tried incremental up-sampling, and my results agree with what I know
> about digital filtering: you lose more detail with incremental up-sampling
> than you do with single up-sampling.
>
> That said, I've tried the GF converter on some sample images, and it's
> pretty impressive. However, if you try to use it on graphical shapes, like
> perfect sharp-edged circles, you will see slight anomalies that aren't
there
> in Lanczos interpolation. For real-world images, I think it's definitely
> better than Photoshop single or multiple up-sampling.
>
> Just download the trial and give it some images. As I recall, you can load
> and save ten images.

-
Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.