|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
Byard, Be aware that the trial versions all allow for limited file sizes and limited increases in size and resolutions of the images. I do not know the actual limitations; but I do know that there are limitations. This is why I did not suggest it; however, what you want to do may fit within the restrictions. -----Original Message----- From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]On Behalf Of byard pidgeon Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 5:08 PM To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: Questions about Genuine Fractals Thanks Paul...didn't realize there was a trial version. Haven't been to the site yet. on 04/25/2002 01:28 AM, Paul D. DeRocco at email@example.com wrote: > I've tried incremental up-sampling, and my results agree with what I know > about digital filtering: you lose more detail with incremental up-sampling > than you do with single up-sampling. > > That said, I've tried the GF converter on some sample images, and it's > pretty impressive. However, if you try to use it on graphical shapes, like > perfect sharp-edged circles, you will see slight anomalies that aren't there > in Lanczos interpolation. For real-world images, I think it's definitely > better than Photoshop single or multiple up-sampling. > > Just download the trial and give it some images. As I recall, you can load > and save ten images. - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions. - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.