| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
At 04:33 19/04/02, Kennedy wrote: >>Have you tried it Dickbo? You probably should before you make assumptions, >>especially since the trial version is free. >He wasn't making assumptions, Jack, just stating a very obvious fact. > >There may well be reasons why the resultant compressed tonal regions are >less objectionable when other tonal ranges have been expanded (such as a >low pixel population density in the compressed regions) but compressed >they will be - it cannot be avoided. I would assume that SHO uses some variation on contrast masking in which case you can to some extent have your cake and eat it too. Geographical variation in processing. Julian Robinson Canberra, Australia http://members.austarmetro.com.au/~julian/ - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
[Books] [Home] [Photos] [Yosemite] [Scanners] [Steve's Art] [The Gimp] [100% Free Online Dating] [PhotoForum] [Epson Inkjet]