Re: Sprintscan 120 issues/findings (comments welcomed)

[Julian Robinson <julian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 04:33 19/04/02, Kennedy wrote:
>>Have you tried it Dickbo? You probably should before you make assumptions,
>>especially since the trial version is free.
>He wasn't making assumptions, Jack, just stating a very obvious fact.
>
>There may well be reasons why the resultant compressed tonal regions are 
>less objectionable when other tonal ranges have been expanded (such as a 
>low pixel population density in the compressed regions) but compressed 
>they will be - it cannot be avoided.

I would assume that SHO uses some variation on contrast masking in which 
case you can to some extent have your cake and eat it 
too.  Geographical  variation in processing.

Julian Robinson
Canberra, Australia
http://members.austarmetro.com.au/~julian/

-
Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.