|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
In article <3CBB4AE4.509.CF4BE8@localhost>, firstname.lastname@example.org writes > >The bins have to fall off somewhere, don't they, >Kennedy? > >Having the CCD's analog values fall "comfortably" >inside the A/D limiting values is no huge sin -- >not compared to the opposite error, which really is >clipping. The analog values have to be manipulated >into some range, no? Better that the range is >narrower than the A/D's range, than wider. > >I mis-spoke a bit using the word "abrupt." What >I meant is that there are no pixels -- none at all -- >represented in the histogram, below, say, 15 o 20 >or so. (The exact value varies from image to image.) >But I didn't mean to imply a steep wall in the >histogram at that point. > That certainly sounds more like a normal distribution than your previous description. -- Kennedy Yes, Socrates himself is particularly missed; A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's pissed. Python Philosophers - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.