| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
At 2:49 PM -0400 12-4-02, East75th wrote: >Bill: I hope you noticed the other theme of the story: that a truly objective method would result in images that are deemed to be flat and unappealing and thus unlikely to attract widespread commercial application... Dane-- I'd assumed that "flat and unappealing" would be the natural result of comparing the limited-gamut pigments of the "old masters" to todays vibrant colors that blast at us from TV and print ads. Personally, I'd love to have full spectrum, scene-accurate data from my digital cameras and scanners. It would give me better, more complete raw material to modify in Photoshop to meet my editorial or artistic needs. Instead of using different films for high-key, low-key, portraits, landscapes, etc. I'd just apply Photoshop curves that have the same effect. Also, if my scanners/cameras could see the full spectrum I wouldn't have so much trouble with creating input profiles, and wouldn't get color dropouts where the scene emits/reflects a different set of light wavelengths than the scanner/camera is sensitive to. --Bill -- ====================================================================== Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design (505) 346-3080 * bill_sub@billfernandez.com * http://billfernandez.com ====================================================================== - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
[Books] [Home] [Photos] [Yosemite] [Scanners] [Steve's Art] [The Gimp] [100% Free Online Dating] [PhotoForum] [Epson Inkjet]