Re: To David Soderman: A Little Test

["Dave King" <kingphoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Rafe, a deadhead?  I didn't know that.  I like him better all the time!

Art, get a life.

Dave

----- Original Message -----
From: "Arthur Entlich" <artistic-1@shaw.ca>
To: <scan@leben.com>
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 5:15 AM
Subject: Re: To David Soderman: A Little Test


> As I recall, you're the "dead-head", my friend.  I didn't need to go all
> over the country chasing musical idols, to have an excuse to dope up on
> cheap adulterants of questionable lineage.  So don't attribute your
> current mental confusion to me.  The stuff I used was of known heritage.
>   No flashbacks here.
>
> I know exactly which side I'm on, it's your problem that it just happens
> to be one your head is still too foggy to fully appreciate.
>
> Art
>
> rafe.bustin@verizon.net wrote:
>
> > On 11 Apr 2002 at 0:49, Moreno Polloni wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>The Nikon scanners are unique in their design in that rather than
> >>>providing color separating filters over the CCD element lines, they
> >>>flash a sequence of LED lights RGBRGBRGB, or with dICE
> >>>RGB(IR)RGB(IR)RGB(IR).  On their more recent scanners, they move the
> >>>whole optical assembly rather than the film, so once the film is
> >>>positioned in the correct frame, it works more like a flatbed, in that
> >>>the scanner mechanism moves while the film remains stationary.
> >>>
> >>Sorry, but you're wrong (again). On the 8000 the film moves during the
scan.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > With Art, there's a very fine line between speculation and fact,
> > and Art himself is never quite sure which side he's on.
> >
> >
> > rafe b.


-
Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.