|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
This is the method to which I resorted initially, because I was impatient and had no scanner. I set up 35mm slides on a light table, put a digital camera on a tripod, and shot. The idea was to do copy work, essentially. You are asking about equipment, and I'm afraid I don't have any thoughts on this part of it. What I can offer, though, is a warning. Slides and negs are pretty small unless you're working with at least 4x5. So if the best you can managed is the arrangement I've described, you probably are going to find yourself with a couple serious problems. One will be lens selection and alignment. Unless you use a long lens (100mm +), you will achieve the effect of barrel distortion. Also, it's pretty awfully difficult to get both planes perfectly parallel, first of all, and then perfectly lined up so the image looks perfectly horizontal. I **do** copy work for artists. It's hard enough to get an 8x10 image perfectly aligned to the camera using eyeballs. With 35mm slides, I'd say forget it, unless you've already got equipment set up for slide duping. Maybe others will disagree with me, or have actual experience pulling this off with an expensive camera. I'd be skeptical. With my copy work experience, I thought I could pull it off. Now I wouldn't waste the time. What's the point of all the acrobatics and microphotography when you can get superior results from a $500-$600 scanner? I only even tried it because I did have the camera, and did not yet have the scanner. If you can overcome the problems I've reported, more power to you. Otherwise, a waste of time. Even for greeting cards, the result probably are going to suck beyond your imagination. And I haven't even addressed the problems associated with light source or control over the scan. Mike Healy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Cummins" <email@example.com> To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 6:00 AM Subject: Digital cameras as "scanners" > Are there any subjective or objective comparisons of > (5M, ~$999 flavor) digital camera capture of slides or > negatives vs scanning the same slide or negative. > Auxillary lens usage is assumed for the digitial camera. > > If cropping is done at the capture point the camera > resolution would also be spread over the specific area > of interest. The burden of color and mask corrections > would, of course, move to the software side after capture. > > > > - > Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate > subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions. > - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.