Re: To David Soderman: A Little Test

[Arthur Entlich <artistic-1@xxxxxxx>]

As I recall, you're the "dead-head", my friend.  I didn't need to go all 
over the country chasing musical idols, to have an excuse to dope up on 
cheap adulterants of questionable lineage.  So don't attribute your 
current mental confusion to me.  The stuff I used was of known heritage. 
  No flashbacks here.

I know exactly which side I'm on, it's your problem that it just happens 
to be one your head is still too foggy to fully appreciate.

Art

rafe.bustin@verizon.net wrote:

> On 11 Apr 2002 at 0:49, Moreno Polloni wrote:
> 
> 
>>>The Nikon scanners are unique in their design in that rather than
>>>providing color separating filters over the CCD element lines, they
>>>flash a sequence of LED lights RGBRGBRGB, or with dICE
>>>RGB(IR)RGB(IR)RGB(IR).  On their more recent scanners, they move the
>>>whole optical assembly rather than the film, so once the film is
>>>positioned in the correct frame, it works more like a flatbed, in that
>>>the scanner mechanism moves while the film remains stationary.
>>>
>>Sorry, but you're wrong (again). On the 8000 the film moves during the scan.
>>
> 
> 
> 
> With Art, there's a very fine line between speculation and fact, 
> and Art himself is never quite sure which side he's on.
> 
> 
> rafe b.
> 


-
Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.