Re: To David Soderman: A Little Test

["Dave King" <kingphoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

----- Original Message -----
From: <rafe.bustin@verizon.net>
To: <scan@leben.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 9:11 PM
Subject: Re: To David Soderman: A Little Test


>
> [rafe b:]
> > >Here's my other problem with Ed's theory:  If it were so,
> > >Nikon should be able to offer a firmware upgrade to fix this
> > >problem -- but they have not.
>
> [Kennedy McEwen]
> > But, in their opinion, they have - they might even claim to have
> > anticipated the problem and the firmware was already available as an
> > option, called superfine mode.
>
>
> Umm, yes. I'm afraid I see your point.  Seems rather
> crass, doesn't it?
>
>
> rafe b.

Is it possible the designers knew from the start the 3 CCD approach wouldn't
be as good as 1, and intended for "production" work where speed is
frequently as (or more) important than quality?  I'd bet newspapers and
magazines around the world buy a lot of nikon scanners.

Dave


-
Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.