| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
In article <3CB3E9FB.2060304@shaw.ca>, Arthur Entlich <artistic-1@shaw.ca> writes > >This creates a noticeably soft result. The "good" part about it is it >reduced grain and dirt/dust considerably. The bad part is that >although I had many less of the typical speckled type of sharpening >artifacts, when I used USM, the amount of USM necessary to make the >image look sharp created a different artifact - overly accentuated edge >definition. > What USM parameters are you using? I would expect that the radius should be one pixel or less for the level of defocus that would be sufficient to reduce aliasing to an acceptable level. -- Kennedy Yes, Socrates himself is particularly missed; A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's pissed. Python Philosophers - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
[Books] [Home] [Photos] [Yosemite] [Scanners] [Steve's Art] [The Gimp] [100% Free Online Dating] [PhotoForum] [Epson Inkjet]