| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On 9 Apr 2002 at 10:10, gary wrote: > If you look around the rest of the image, more than just the banding was > improved. Look at the definition of the shadows on the floor or table where > the plant rests. There is a shadow near the point where the plant container > goes from a straight walled (cylinder) to a V-shape that is lost on the > normal scan and present on the superfine. > > There still seems to be a blur around the flowers in superfine. Is that due > to lens flare or the animal shaking the plant? Superfine removes the > horizontal bands, but I see vertical bands on the superfine to the left of > the lower flower. Not bands as much as a ghost of the flower edge. IMHO, you're reading WAY too much into two little JPGs. rafe b. - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
[Books] [Home] [Photos] [Yosemite] [Scanners] [Steve's Art] [The Gimp] [100% Free Online Dating] [PhotoForum] [Epson Inkjet]