[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Google
  Web www.spinics.net

RE: Nikon Acknowleges Banding, Sort Of



On 9 Apr 2002 at 10:10, gary wrote:

> If you look around the rest of the image, more than just the banding was
> improved. Look at the definition of the shadows on the floor or table where
> the plant rests. There is a shadow near the point where the plant container
> goes from a straight walled (cylinder) to a V-shape that is lost on the
> normal scan and present on the superfine.
> 
> There still seems to be a blur around the flowers in superfine. Is that due
> to lens flare or the animal shaking the plant? Superfine removes the
> horizontal bands, but I see vertical bands on the superfine to the left of
> the lower flower. Not bands as much as a ghost of the flower edge.


IMHO, you're reading WAY too much into two little JPGs.


rafe b.

-
Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.

[Books]     [Home]     [Photos]     [Yosemite]     [Scanners]     [Steve's Art]     [The Gimp]     [100% Free Online Dating]     [PhotoForum]     [Epson Inkjet]

Powered by Linux