| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
In article <101835976001@wi.net>, david/lisa soderman <scapes@wi.net> writes >Tan wrote: > >> I tried the defocus suggestion and it doesn't do any good - I get a >> slightly blurred version of a grainy scan! >Did you then try applying USM? (Are you out there, Art & Kennedy?) >> Yes - and I am waiting to hear the answer. ;-) However a "blurry version of a grainy scan" does indicate that the defocus has eliminated the spatial frequencies which could read to grain aliasing, possibly with too much blur to be able to adequately recover remaining information with USM. Whether it makes up for the difference between the Minolta and the Nikon depends on whether that is primarily due to aliasing. Having the original images and the scanned results from the Nikon puts you in one of the best positions for making such a comparison. -- Kennedy Yes, Socrates himself is particularly missed; A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's pissed. Python Philosophers - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
[Books] [Home] [Photos] [Yosemite] [Scanners] [Steve's Art] [The Gimp] [100% Free Online Dating] [PhotoForum] [Epson Inkjet]