| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
>>but it seems to fly in the face >>of the 4800ppi's "extra sharpness" as being the culprit re: grain/noise. >> > Well, for the moment, I disagree with that conclusion David, and I will > tell you why in due course, but I am interested to hear how you arrived > at it. > -- > Kennedy Nothing profound. All I meant was to point out that none of the previous noisy scans were done at interpolated 4800ppi...and that the lower rez scans of 3.2k (supposedly opticel)/1.6k sport the same noise /grain. Joyfully, -david soderman- <>< - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
[Books] [Home] [Photos] [Yosemite] [Scanners] [Steve's Art] [The Gimp] [100% Free Online Dating] [PhotoForum] [Epson Inkjet]