| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
Rafe wrote: > Have you considered that the "grain" you speak of might > be a form of posterization? > > This can be particularly annoying with underexposed print > film. Just a wild guess, is all. But it might not be so much > the dreaded grain aliasing that others have mentioned; > there are other possible explanations. In this case, the film was overexposed by one stop, as usual. ISO 160 rated at 80. Joyfully, -david soderman- <>< - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
[Books] [Home] [Photos] [Yosemite] [Scanners] [Steve's Art] [The Gimp] [100% Free Online Dating] [PhotoForum] [Epson Inkjet]