|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
The Nikon has it and by a mile I'd say. ----- Original Message ----- From: "david/lisa soderman" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: <email@example.com> Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 6:15 AM Subject: GRAIN/ICE SHOWDOWN: Nikon LS8000 vs. Minolta Scan Multi Pro! > Howdy there, > > Here's an URL that might interest some of you: > > www.dreamscapesphoto.com/files/p23graintest.htm > > I came across some 6x6 neg scans that I did before I exchanged my Nikon > 8000ED > unit. I decided to post those scans in contrast to these from the Minolta > Scan > Multi Pro. > > Please try not to get hung up about differences in color, contrast, > brightness, etc.. > The main objective of the test was to compare GRAIN and ICE. > These tests are far from perfect, but they're close enough to get the point > across. > > 6x6 Kodak Portra 160NC color neg film. (rated @ 80 ISO) > > To me, the Minolta scans look extremely grainy for a moderately slow > negative film. > > Is anyone else out there scanning color negs with the Scan Multi Pro? If > so, what kind of results are you getting? Is this typical? Am I > over-reacting? Do I have a defective unit? Am I doing something wrong? > Would anyone care to trade a Nikon 8000ED for a Minolta Scan Multi Pro? > > -david soderman- <>< > > - > Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate > subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions. - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.