| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On 5 Apr 2002 at 1:44, Arthur Entlich wrote: > > > byard pidgeon wrote: > > > WOuld also be nice to know if the prints were made with condenser or > > diffusion. > > > > Also, I wonder if the pepper grain and bubbles show as much if one enlarges > > the neg/slide to final size during the scan, rather than in an image editor? > > > Are you referring to upsampling via an image program, versus using the > native scanning optical scan resolution? I would expect upsampling > would tend to emphasize the aliasing, but that might depend upon the > method of upsampling used. Gee, for a moment, I thought you "got it." Aliasing has to do with the bandwidth of the input, relative to the sampling rate. Nothing more and nothing less. Any input with a frequency content beyond (sampling rate / 2) leads to aliasing. That's all there is to it. "Upsampling" is post processing of the sampled data. It's usually just a euphemism for interpolation -- taking a best guess at what the data "might have been" with a higher sampling rate. rafe b. - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
[Books] [Home] [Photos] [Yosemite] [Scanners] [Steve's Art] [The Gimp] [100% Free Online Dating] [PhotoForum] [Epson Inkjet]