|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
Recently we bought a Hewlett-Packard 7400C scanner which is a flatbed scanner. It has a transparency adapter which allows for scanning film up to 5 by 5 inches. I have compared a scan from that new HP scanner with a scan from my old Nikon LS-2000 film scanner. The result shows that the Nikon scanner is better - the scan has more details - than the HP scanner. But from my point of view, I do not consider the difference to be big enough to justify buying an expensive film scanner. I.e. today I should not have bought the Nikon LS-2000 if I had the HP 7400C. In any case, I have to adjust the scans from both scanners in Photoshop to get what I want. I have published the two example scans at http://www.cybis.se/forfun/digfoto/fork2e.htm /Lars-Åke Larsson www.cybis.se - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.