| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
===================== John Weiss wrote: >I'm not sure if we're talking about the same thing. Here in the UK you can >buy film adapters for both 1250 and 1650 which you use in place of the >normal lid. I presume that the Photo version of each has this film adapter >instead of a standard lid. The adapter for the 1250 is specified as having a >reading area of 36x36mm, whereas the adapter for the 1650 has a maximum >reading area of 4x5in and is supplied with a range of film holders, for >single 35mm, strips of 35mm, 6x6cm and 4x5in. I was told by technical >support at Epson UK that film adapter sold for the 1650 could just as easily >be used on the 1250, the mode of use being the same, with resolution the >only difference. > >John Weiss > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Don Dement" <don.dement@verizon.net> >: > >: John, the 1650 P has its own light source built into the lid. A >: fluorescent tube in a holder -- narrow. That's why it's more expensive, >: I think. >: >: FYI, it won't reliably scan film larger than 35mm, although I've got >: some central parts of larger negs that I wanted just by experimenting. >: It looks for the film holder when you tell it this is film, so without >: the holder it won't scan. The holder masks the light width, so you're >: constrained to the width of the slide holder (2") if you're using film >: laying under the slide window. Hokey, but it works, up to that size. >: >: I assume the 1250 adapter has a wider light source to permit larger neg >: sizes? The light source width and uniformity of brightness is important. >: >: You didn't say but I thought I'd tell you about the 1650 and get a >: comparison. Your 6cm is about 2 3/8", and would not scan fully in a 1650 >: 2" slide opening, but pretty close. >: > >- >Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate >subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions. > > Interesting. I think we have different editions here in the States, of the same model number. My film adapter, under a narrowly-defined purpose of just holding film, would work on any flatbad scanner. The difference in the 1650 I have is the light source in the lid, which is narrow and I suspect designed only for 35mm film. I would like to have had the larger negative/film capability that you have. -- Regards -- Don Dement - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
[Books] [Home] [Photos] [Yosemite] [Scanners] [Steve's Art] [The Gimp] [100% Free Online Dating] [PhotoForum] [Epson Inkjet]