| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
It all comes down to bananas. ;-) Actually, I would guess it wasn't that difficult, but more time consuming. If you create a scenario where the only distinguishing characteristic between two objects is their color, and you provide different rewards/punishments based upon that difference, you can monitor if the animal (or human) can consistently select the "correct" object. Be making the colors closer and closer in value and hue, eventually there would be a point where errors would creep in or an inability to select the "correct" object would occur. Assuming other variables, like lighting type and levels, were accounted for, if you did this with the basic cone color sensitivities, (red green and blue) in a number of values, you could interpolate and theorize the ranges of ability to distinguish between colors. I also assume that using certain anatomical comparisons of eye structures, lenses, pupil size, retinal density of rods and cones, etc. certain generalizations could be made within reason. Obviously, working with human subjects would simplify the process. Art Preston Earle wrote: > "Arthur Entlich" <artistic-1@shaw.ca> wrote: "Most higher primates > (including humans) can see somewhere in the area of 2.3 million > discernible colors." > > > Boy, I'd love to see how they ran that experiment! > > Preston Earle > PEarle@triad.rr.com > - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
[Books] [Home] [Photos] [Yosemite] [Scanners] [Steve's Art] [The Gimp] [100% Free Online Dating] [PhotoForum] [Epson Inkjet]