| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
Quite right. -- Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco Paul mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com > From: Hersch Nitikman > > If this is so, then the best/only(?) > reason for going to 16 bits per primary color is to have spare pixels to > maintain the quality of the image through the > editing/optimization process, > before dropping down to 8 bits for display. Am I wrong in this? - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
[Books] [Home] [Photos] [Yosemite] [Scanners] [Steve's Art] [The Gimp] [100% Free Online Dating] [PhotoForum] [Epson Inkjet]