Re: Levels & Curves

[Kennedy McEwen <rkm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In article <3C2B12AE.9010807@ampsc.com>, Arthur Entlich 
<artistic@ampsc.com> writes
>
>Why so harsh on the guy?
>
Wilhelm made his reputation as the guy who accused Kodak of using an 
optimistic test methodology for measuring the longevity of their print 
and film materials.

This is the same guy who used an extremely optimistic methodology to 
measure the longevity of Epson's long-life inks that were promised to 
give us "inkjet prints that could be handled like normal photographs".

Does he have an apology for misleading the public (in the same way as he 
accused Kodak of doing so many years ago) on his revamped website?  Does 
he apologise for making the same mistake as he found Big Yellow doing? 
Does he thank any of the many individuals who worked to try to resolve 
the cause of the problem that he had ignored?

Somehow, I think I can guess the answer to all of these questions before 
I visit his new pages, but I might be wrong.
-- 
Kennedy
Yes, Socrates himself is particularly missed;
A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's pissed.
Python Philosophers
-
Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.