| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
Well, go argue with the major art museums that have photograms in their holdings. Oh, and wear a raincoat as you do you know what into the wind. on 12/26/2001 09:33 PM, Dave King at kingphoto@mindspring.com wrote: > It's true that *photograms* don't require a lens, but certainly in the > generic sense photographs require a lens (or at least some crude aperture). > Photograms are a category onto themselves, and some might argue they aren't > pure "photographs" because no "artificial eye" is employed in the recording > chain. Eye would:) > > Dave > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: byard pidgeon <bluedove@ccountry.net> > To: <scan@leben.com> > Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 2:38 PM > Subject: Re: Levels & Curves > > >> Photography doesn't require a lens...look at work by Man Ray, Christian >> Schad, Moholy-Nagy and many others. >> >> on 12/26/2001 06:20 AM, Dave King at kingphoto@mindspring.com wrote: >> >>> Gary -- real photograph? I love comments like this for their stubborn >>> intransigence. I have a friend who asked me, "do you make any real >>> photographs still?" I asked him if he ever listened to any real music >>> still. (He listens to CDs). The basis of photography is recording with >>> lenses, >> >> - >> Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate >> subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions. >> > > - > Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate > subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions. > - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
[Books] [Home] [Photos] [Yosemite] [Scanners] [Steve's Art] [The Gimp] [100% Free Online Dating] [PhotoForum] [Epson Inkjet]