Re: Levels & Curves

["Dave King" <kingphoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm reading the list backwards, but I find much to disagree with in your
posts Gary:)

Why exactly does it suck that a brand new technology is getting better
rapidly?

Ink jet technology puts dyes in place with less "blending distortion" (to
coin a term) than any other digital printing process, and therefore has the
greatest potential for accuracy.  Hence the faster progress:)

Dave

----- Original Message -----
From: gary <gsellani@accesscom.com>
To: <scan@leben.com>
Sent: Monday, December 24, 2001 9:34 PM
Subject: RE: Levels & Curves


> I think we will all buy new printers every 3rd generation. Yes, this
sucks.
> Dots will get smaller as time marches on.
>
> In theory, dye-sub should be the final answer, but it seems there is much
> faster progress in ink jets.
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-scan@leben.com [mailto:owner-scan@leben.com]On Behalf Of
> > Bill Agee
> > Sent: Monday, December 24, 2001 1:10 PM
> > To: scan@leben.com
> > Subject: RE: Levels & Curves
> >  Short of
> > outputing to large scale negatives / positives and contact printing
> > on silver media...just where do you think this technology of Iris,
> > Epson, etc should go?
> >
> > Bill Agee

-
Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.