| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
o In most cases a dedicated filmscanner will indeed give you significantly better results than a flatbed. o The best bang for the buck currently seems to be the Polaroid SS4000 for $700 minus a $200 rebate. o I'm not sure if there's anything decent in the $300 to $400 range, but you should check prices on the low-end Minoltas. o A recent review of the Epson Perfection 2450 flatbed scanner at http://www.virtualtraveller.org/epson2450.htm looked very promising, and isn't that in the $300 price range? --Bill At 1:25 PM -0500 11/23/01, WJVinSJ@aol.com wrote: >Hi, >I am thinking of buying a negative and slide only scanner. I hope this will >mean I get more quality for my money, rather than a scanner that scans prints >also. I would like advice about this, and also approximate price and brand >information. Am I wrong to think I could get good quality for about $300. to >$400. ? >Also, how much more would I have to pay to get firewire. I have a G3 >Macintosh with a firewire, usb card. >Thanks to anyone willing to answer. I welcome all opinions, and/or links. >Wil >- >Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate >subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions. -- ====================================================================== Bill Fernandez * User Interface Architect * Bill Fernandez Design (505) 346-3080 * bill_sub@billfernandez.com * http://billfernandez.com ====================================================================== - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
[Books] [Home] [Photos] [Yosemite] [Scanners] [Steve's Art] [The Gimp] [100% Free Online Dating] [PhotoForum] [Epson Inkjet]