| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
At 03:09 17 11 2001 , you wrote: >I can't answer for the Epson 1650 specifically, but I don't see how it >would be any different from any other scanner for which my generic answer >would be: > >o I personally have never had a problem that I could attribute to leaving >scanners (or computers or printers or hard drives, etc.) on for weeks at a >time. I thank Bill and Bayard for their helpful replies. I think that maybe my question was not well formed. I wasn't asking if it would be _ok_ to leave the scanner on constantly, but _should_ the scanner be left on -- as a printer should be. Is there any grief to a scanner if it is turned off nightly??? I guess the only advantage is that leaving it on would ensure the it was warmed up optimally. The only disadvantage is the waste of electrical power and thereby some harm to the environment. But in my little town the power is generated locally from a mountain stream that feeds the power station and waters the town -- and my garden in the summer. Other comments??? TX Jim Green mailto:JMGreen@sisna.com http://users.sisna.com/jmgreen - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
[Books] [Home] [Photos] [Yosemite] [Scanners] [Steve's Art] [The Gimp] [100% Free Online Dating] [PhotoForum] [Epson Inkjet]