[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: Epson 1650



At 03:09 17 11 2001 , you wrote:
>I can't answer for the Epson 1650 specifically, but I don't see how it 
>would be any different from any other scanner for which my generic answer 
>would be:
>
>o I personally have never had a problem that I could attribute to leaving 
>scanners (or computers or printers or hard drives, etc.) on for weeks at a 
>time.

I thank Bill and Bayard for their helpful replies. I think that maybe my 
question was not well formed. I wasn't asking if it would be _ok_ to leave 
the scanner on constantly, but _should_ the scanner be left on -- as a 
printer should be. Is there any grief to a scanner if it is turned off 
nightly???

I guess the only advantage is that leaving it on would ensure the it was 
warmed up optimally.  The only disadvantage is the waste of electrical 
power and thereby some harm to the environment.  But in my little town the 
power is generated locally from a mountain stream that feeds the power 
station and waters the town -- and my garden in the summer.

Other comments???

TX

Jim Green
mailto:JMGreen@sisna.com
http://users.sisna.com/jmgreen

-
Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.

[Books]     [Home]     [Photos]     [Yosemite]     [Scanners]     [Steve's Art]     [The Gimp]     [100% Free Online Dating]     [PhotoForum]     [Epson Inkjet]

Powered by Linux