Re: Winbind 3.2.0rc2 Coredump [was: Re: Help needed. Samba 3.2.0rc2 - IDMAP - Windows 2008 Server - ADS Integration - Winbind]

[Scott Lovenberg <scott.lovenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Scott Lovenberg wrote:
> Samba-Liste wrote:
> > Hi Scott,
> >
> > thanks for the reply.
> >
> > On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 05:39 -0400, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
> >   
> > > Samba-Liste wrote: 
> > >     
> > > > Hi,
> > > >       
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >   
> > > >   
> > > >       
> > > Have you tried using the 'nss_ldap' with the entry 'ldap' in your
> > > nsswitch.conf?  I found that to be the best way to interface the LDAP 
> > > backend in my case.  I tried the pam route, but since Slackware does 
> > >     
> >
> > that's how we do it right now as we have a Samba-LDAP-PDC. But didn't
> > get it working against my new Windows 2008 ADS server. Can you provide
> > sample configurations for nss_ldap to connect to an ADS server?
> >
> > thank you and best regards
> >
> >            Daniel
> >
> >   
> Sorry for the delay, I think I jumbled my email boxes :)
>
> This is off the top of my head (as my official Samba book is at home 
> and I'm at work), but, all you should need is the nss_ldap module and 
> the following lines in your /etc/nsswitch.conf:
> [...]
> passwd   files ldap winbind compat
> shadow   files ldap winbind compat
> group      files ldap winbind compat
> [...]
>
>
> This should enable getent passwd.  IIRC, there are no dependencies for 
> nss_ldap, it just needs to be compiled.  At least on Slackware, as 
> always, check with your upstream provider before compiling your own.
Strange... I just noticed how you fixed the problem at first, are you 
sure that everything was compiled with the same libraries?  Also, can 
you verify that ldap_nss was compiled with the "--enable-rfc2307bis" 
flag?  Something isn't adding up.  I fear I've missed something here.

I was taking the missing nss directory to mean that you didn't have the 
correct nss modules installed, but I think you've just stumped me.  Does 
anyone more qualified than myself have a feeling one way or the other on 
this?  The fact that the library wasn't symlinked disturbs me a bit.  
Could this be conflicting libraries from different compiles?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba