Re: Samba "Preferred Platform" | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Friday 27 June 2008 23:10:55 William W. Hammond wrote: > I have set up several OpenSuSE 10.3 File Servers... > > These are small environments, 5 - 15 workstations. > > They are purely File (and possibly Application) Servers.... > > All are AMD64. > > Since the Servers only purpose in life is to support Samba. > > 1.) Is there a platform Linux/Unix, where Samba is better supported...? OpenSUSE is OK. Red Hat Fedora or Ubuntu Server will work just as well. It's all a matter of how well you set things up and manage them. > 2.) Does Samba utilize a 64 bit environment, or is it better to > install 32 bit for compatibility..? Samba is 64-bit enabled. On OpenSUSE, Red Hat Fedora, Ubuntu 8.04 64-bit OS installations Samba is capable of running as a full 64-bit application. > > A GUI is nice, I can get around in the CLI, but by no means am I > proficient. So long as your Samba PDC is correctly configured, user and group administration can be done from a MS Windows client using: a) The NT4 Domain User Manager Note: Some things (like user rights and privilege management) will no longer work from a Windows 2000/2003/XPPro/Vista client using this old NT4 tool. b) The LDAP Admin tool See: http://ldapadmin.sourceforge.net/ If you follow the implementation of Samba3-ByExample, chapter 4 or 5, you will be able to use the above tools to manage your Samba network. Some things will need to be done from the CLI, that is life! I hope this answers your questions/concerns. Cheers, John T. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Linux] [Info Cyrus] [LARTC] [Christmas Music] [Bugtraq] [Netfilter] [Internet Dating Forums] [RAID] [Yosemite News] [Photography]
![]() |
![]() |