Re: samba & ldap

[Collen Blijenberg <collen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

What about the mysql/pgsql backend ??!
ideal for the middle class. (if your intentions are running a pdc/bdc)

Collen.

Edmundo Valle Neto wrote:
> Charles Marcus escreveu:
> > On 5/15/2008 3:40 AM, Esteban Torres Rodriguez wrote:
> >  
> > > > I'm new here and I have a doubt... I'm work with windows 2003 server
> > > > and now i would change to llnux. My doubt regards the share of my
> > > > server: to authenticate my users what is better: samba tdb or ldap?
> > > > For us is not necessary an active directory, domain, ecc... I need
> > > > only a file server and I have arounud 400 users...Anyone have 
> > > > experience? Any suggestions?
> > > >       
> >
> >  
> > > always ldap.
> > >     
> >
> > Not necessarily...
> >
> > tdb is *very* fast and reliable, much simpler to set up and maintain,
> > and if you don't *need* all the bells and whistles of ldap (high
> > availability, SSO, etc), tdb is the better choice - at least in my
> > opinion...
>
> Depends of what is needed, in my opinion if an user must have the same 
> password in samba AND any other service, use LDAP.
>
> Regards.
>
> Edmundo Valle Neto
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba